I have taken a selection from the book, The Principle of Relativity, by H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl, first published by Dover in 1923. The selection, by Dr. Einstein, is entitled, "Does The Inertia Of A Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?" In it he concludes that “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy-content; . . .” There seems to be a serious physical flaw in his derivation. The selection is reproduced below, my comments after.

DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON

ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?

By A. Einstein

The results of the previous investigation lead to a very interesting conclusion, which is here to be deduced.

I based that investigation on the Maxwell-Hertz equations for empty space, together with the Maxwellian expression for the electromagnetic energy of space, and in addition the principle that:--

The laws by which the states of physical systems alter are independent of the alternative, to which of two systems of coordinates, in uniform motion of parallel translation relatively to each other, these alterations of state are referred (principle of relativity).

With these principles as my basis I deduced inter alia the following result (§ 8):--

Let a system of plane waves of light, referred to the system of co-ordinates (x,y,z), possess the energy L; let the direction of the ray (the wave-normal) make an angle Ø with the axis of x of the system. If we introduce a new system of co-ordinates (x',y',z' ) moving in uniform parallel translation with respect to the system (x,y,z), and having its origin of co-ordinates in motion along the axis of x with the velocity u, then this quantity of light--measured in the system (x',y',z' )--possesses the energy

L* = L (1 – (u/c) cos Ø) / (1 – u2/c2)1/2

where c denotes the velocity of light. We shall make use of this result in what follows.

Let there be a stationary body in the system (x,y,z), and let its energy--referred to the system (x,y,z)--be E0. Let the energy of the body relative to the system (x',y',z' ), moving as above with the velocity u, be H0.

Let this body send out, in a direction making an angle Ø with the axis of x, plane waves of light, of energy L/2 measured relatively to (x,y,z) and simultaneously an equal quantity of light in the opposite direction. Meanwhile the body remains at rest with respect to the system (x,y,z). The principle of energy must apply to this process, and in fact (by the principle of relativity) with respect to both systems of co-ordinates. If we call the energy of the body after the emission of light E1 or H1 respectively, measured relatively to the system (x,y,z) or (x',y',z' ) respectively, then by employing the relation given above we obtain

E0 = E1 + L/2 + L/2

H0 = H1 + [(L/2)(1 – (u/c) cos Ø) + (L/2)(1+(u/c) cos Ø)]/(1 – u2/c2)1/2

= H1 + L/(1 – u2/c2)1/2

By subtraction we obtain from these equations

H0 – E0 – (H1 – E1) = L{1/(1 – u2/c2)1/2 – 1}.

The two differences of the form H – E occurring in this expression have simple physical significations. H and E are energy values of the same body referred to two systems of co-ordinates which are in motion relatively to each other, the body being at rest in one of the two systems (system (x,y,z)). Thus it is clear that the difference H – E can differ from the kinetic energy K of the body, with respect to the other system (x',y',z' ) only by an additive constant C, which depends on the choice of the arbitrary additive constants of the energies H and E. Thus we may place

H0 – E0 = K0 + C,

H1 – E1 = K1 + C,

since C does not change during the emission of light. So we have

K0 – K1 = L{1/(1 – u2/c2)1/2 – 1}.

The kinetic energy of the body with respect to (x,y,z ) diminishes as a result of the emission of light, and the amount of diminution is independent of the properties of the body. Moreover, the difference K0 – K1, like the kinetic energy of the electron (§ 10), depends on the velocity.

Neglecting magnitudes of fourth and higher orders we may place

K0 – K1 = (1/2) u2 (L/c2)

From this equation it directly follows that:--

If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2. The fact that the energy withdrawn from the body becomes energy of radiation evidently makes no difference, so that we are led to the more general conclusion that

The mass of a body is a measure of its energy-content; if the energy changes by L, the mass changes in the same sense by L/9 x 10^20, the energy being measured in ergs, and the mass in grammes.

It is not impossible that with bodies whose energy-content is variable to a high degree (e.g. with radium salts) the theory may be successfully put to the test.

If the theory corresponds to the facts, radiation conveys inertia between the emitting and absorbing bodies.

---------- Footnotes ----------

1. The principle of the constancy of the velocity of light is of course contained in Maxwell’s equations.

My Comments

Einstein states that there is a difference between the fixed and moving frames of reference in the total energy content of bodies (due to kinetic energy relative to the moving frame and not present in the fixed frame) and that after the light energy is given off, this DIFFERENCE between the fixed and moving reference frame total energies is no longer the same as it was before, i.e.,

(H0 – E0) – (H1 – E1) = L(γ – 1), not zero [where γ = gamma = 1/(1 - u2/c2)1/2.] But by rearranging,

(H0 – E0) – (H1 – E1) = (H0 – H1) – (E0 – E1)

This (H0 – H1) – (E0 – E1) is the difference between the energy loss in the moving frame and that in the rest frame.

But both (H0 – H1) and (E0 – E1) are the amount of energy actually given off from the body! We are not talking here about the 'apparent' amount of energy given off as seen by different observers. We are talking about the actual amount. It can thus be seen that in this case two different amounts of energy have been given off from the body, γL and L, depending on who saw it! Keep in mind that which reference frame is ‘non-moving’ is totally arbitrary.* This is obviously physically impossible. Furthermore, if there are multiple observers, and there are always an infinite number of potential inertial reference frames moving with an infinite number of different speeds, there would be an infinite number of different energies given off during the one event, and this simply will not wash physically.

*This sentence was added August 7, 2014 by the author.